<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Use Generators to create boilerplate code in GWT 2.0</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.jdevelop.eu/2010/01/17/use-generators-to-create-boilerplate-code-in-gwt-20/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.jdevelop.eu/2010/01/17/use-generators-to-create-boilerplate-code-in-gwt-20/</link>
	<description>Under development by Siegfried Bolz</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2012 09:42:28 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: maddy</title>
		<link>http://blog.jdevelop.eu/2010/01/17/use-generators-to-create-boilerplate-code-in-gwt-20/comment-page-1/#comment-396</link>
		<dc:creator>maddy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Oct 2011 17:49:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.jdevelop.eu/?p=515#comment-396</guid>
		<description>I feel sorry for people who have to deal with this stuff.  You have to do all that to make a simple form with a textbox?  Are you kidding me??  Microsoft Visual Studio and Microsoft Office VBA is sooooooo much easier.  Holy cow! 

Dear Google, 
Most people in the world are not C++ programmers.  As technology advances, you're supposed to be making computers and programming them easier for people, not the other way around, trying to turn people into advanced software developers.  What are you thinking?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I feel sorry for people who have to deal with this stuff.  You have to do all that to make a simple form with a textbox?  Are you kidding me??  Microsoft Visual Studio and Microsoft Office VBA is sooooooo much easier.  Holy cow! </p>
<p>Dear Google,<br />
Most people in the world are not C++ programmers.  As technology advances, you&#8217;re supposed to be making computers and programming them easier for people, not the other way around, trying to turn people into advanced software developers.  What are you thinking?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mvp4g multiple presenters - Part 3 &#124; Summa Blog</title>
		<link>http://blog.jdevelop.eu/2010/01/17/use-generators-to-create-boilerplate-code-in-gwt-20/comment-page-1/#comment-363</link>
		<dc:creator>Mvp4g multiple presenters - Part 3 &#124; Summa Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jun 2011 17:06:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.jdevelop.eu/?p=515#comment-363</guid>
		<description>[...] Multiple Presenters series (part 1 and part 2). In this post I will demonstrate how to use the GWT generator to differentiate events that are to be filtered by an event group. This gives you more freedom when [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Multiple Presenters series (part 1 and part 2). In this post I will demonstrate how to use the GWT generator to differentiate events that are to be filtered by an event group. This gives you more freedom when [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MLM Software</title>
		<link>http://blog.jdevelop.eu/2010/01/17/use-generators-to-create-boilerplate-code-in-gwt-20/comment-page-1/#comment-333</link>
		<dc:creator>MLM Software</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Dec 2010 10:51:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.jdevelop.eu/?p=515#comment-333</guid>
		<description>Thanks for sharing

Pooja

http://mlmdevelopers.com/products/mlm-software/corporate-mlm-soft/feature.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for sharing</p>
<p>Pooja</p>
<p><a href="http://mlmdevelopers.com/products/mlm-software/corporate-mlm-soft/feature.html" rel="nofollow">http://mlmdevelopers.com/products/mlm-software/corporate-mlm-soft/feature.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: masch</title>
		<link>http://blog.jdevelop.eu/2010/01/17/use-generators-to-create-boilerplate-code-in-gwt-20/comment-page-1/#comment-262</link>
		<dc:creator>masch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Apr 2010 16:14:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.jdevelop.eu/?p=515#comment-262</guid>
		<description>Hello,

First at all, thank you very much for your example, It helped me a lot. There is something that I do not understand:
Why do you have the isInstanceOf function in each FieldGenerator?
What is it the functionality?
The Eclipse IDE marked as a warning like it is never used in the project, Is it?

Thank you
masch...
salu2...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello,</p>
<p>First at all, thank you very much for your example, It helped me a lot. There is something that I do not understand:<br />
Why do you have the isInstanceOf function in each FieldGenerator?<br />
What is it the functionality?<br />
The Eclipse IDE marked as a warning like it is never used in the project, Is it?</p>
<p>Thank you<br />
masch&#8230;<br />
salu2&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Siegfried Bolz</title>
		<link>http://blog.jdevelop.eu/2010/01/17/use-generators-to-create-boilerplate-code-in-gwt-20/comment-page-1/#comment-239</link>
		<dc:creator>Siegfried Bolz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jan 2010 12:20:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.jdevelop.eu/?p=515#comment-239</guid>
		<description>@David
I don't think so, in my example i am using annotations to reduce the code. I have created other Annotations to simplify Field-Security and to add Handlers/Listeners on the same way. An other option is to use the Builder-Pattern if you have selfmade Widgets. Ok it looks like the old way to code Servlets, but it is working very fine.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@David<br />
I don&#8217;t think so, in my example i am using annotations to reduce the code. I have created other Annotations to simplify Field-Security and to add Handlers/Listeners on the same way. An other option is to use the Builder-Pattern if you have selfmade Widgets. Ok it looks like the old way to code Servlets, but it is working very fine.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Siegfried Bolz</title>
		<link>http://blog.jdevelop.eu/2010/01/17/use-generators-to-create-boilerplate-code-in-gwt-20/comment-page-1/#comment-238</link>
		<dc:creator>Siegfried Bolz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jan 2010 12:13:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.jdevelop.eu/?p=515#comment-238</guid>
		<description>@Venkatesh Sellappa
I am using GXT which is currently not working with the UIBinder. To reduce the amount of code i am using this special Generators.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Venkatesh Sellappa<br />
I am using GXT which is currently not working with the UIBinder. To reduce the amount of code i am using this special Generators.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Venkatesh Sellappa</title>
		<link>http://blog.jdevelop.eu/2010/01/17/use-generators-to-create-boilerplate-code-in-gwt-20/comment-page-1/#comment-237</link>
		<dc:creator>Venkatesh Sellappa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 11:02:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.jdevelop.eu/?p=515#comment-237</guid>
		<description>Any specific reason you don't want to use UIBinder for the same thing ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Any specific reason you don&#8217;t want to use UIBinder for the same thing ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://blog.jdevelop.eu/2010/01/17/use-generators-to-create-boilerplate-code-in-gwt-20/comment-page-1/#comment-236</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 22:11:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.jdevelop.eu/?p=515#comment-236</guid>
		<description>Ugly bugly!
You want to have either factories producing your customized components pre configured, or just extended classes where the configuration is done in the constructor. Specifying attributes in an annotation is just messy, it's worse than setting them directly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ugly bugly!<br />
You want to have either factories producing your customized components pre configured, or just extended classes where the configuration is done in the constructor. Specifying attributes in an annotation is just messy, it&#8217;s worse than setting them directly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: J.F. Zarama</title>
		<link>http://blog.jdevelop.eu/2010/01/17/use-generators-to-create-boilerplate-code-in-gwt-20/comment-page-1/#comment-231</link>
		<dc:creator>J.F. Zarama</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Jan 2010 23:13:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.jdevelop.eu/?p=515#comment-231</guid>
		<description>I read with interest your blog re GWT generators.

The Introduction provides a good contrast of the potential benefit and streamlining.

However, the included example is long and I got lost; I see much code, several classes; I look forward to future posts that will help me better understand GWT 2.0 

Thanks for the blog entry on a subject I am trying to understand; thanks;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I read with interest your blog re GWT generators.</p>
<p>The Introduction provides a good contrast of the potential benefit and streamlining.</p>
<p>However, the included example is long and I got lost; I see much code, several classes; I look forward to future posts that will help me better understand GWT 2.0 </p>
<p>Thanks for the blog entry on a subject I am trying to understand; thanks;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

