<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Experiences with the migration from GWT 1.7.1 to 2.0</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.jdevelop.eu/2009/12/10/experiences-with-the-migration-from-gwt-171-to-20/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.jdevelop.eu/2009/12/10/experiences-with-the-migration-from-gwt-171-to-20/</link>
	<description>Under development by Siegfried Bolz</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 10 Sep 2010 11:35:41 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: scc</title>
		<link>http://blog.jdevelop.eu/2009/12/10/experiences-with-the-migration-from-gwt-171-to-20/comment-page-1/#comment-226</link>
		<dc:creator>scc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Jan 2010 22:47:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.jdevelop.eu/?p=493#comment-226</guid>
		<description>There are environment issues, which aren't described anywhere, and lots of people have small problems...

Read more about these tricks here: http://ui-programming.blogspot.com/2009/12/update-your-application-to-gwt-20.html

Cheers!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are environment issues, which aren&#8217;t described anywhere, and lots of people have small problems&#8230;</p>
<p>Read more about these tricks here: <a href="http://ui-programming.blogspot.com/2009/12/update-your-application-to-gwt-20.html" rel="nofollow">http://ui-programming.blogspot.com/2009/12/update-your-application-to-gwt-20.html</a></p>
<p>Cheers!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Revue de Presse Xebia &#124; Blog Xebia France</title>
		<link>http://blog.jdevelop.eu/2009/12/10/experiences-with-the-migration-from-gwt-171-to-20/comment-page-1/#comment-216</link>
		<dc:creator>Revue de Presse Xebia &#124; Blog Xebia France</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Dec 2009 18:49:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.jdevelop.eu/?p=493#comment-216</guid>
		<description>[...] la migration, les retours (comme celui-ci) sont plutôt encourageants et laissent présager une migration sans trop de difficultés. Les [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] la migration, les retours (comme celui-ci) sont plutôt encourageants et laissent présager une migration sans trop de difficultés. Les [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin Wong</title>
		<link>http://blog.jdevelop.eu/2009/12/10/experiences-with-the-migration-from-gwt-171-to-20/comment-page-1/#comment-213</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin Wong</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 19:58:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.jdevelop.eu/?p=493#comment-213</guid>
		<description>With each new GWT release, you should expect compilations to take longer, not shorter.  This is because of additional JavaScript optimizations that inevitably add to the total time.  Your resulting JavaScript should be smaller and faster, though, which should be the higher priority goal, after all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With each new GWT release, you should expect compilations to take longer, not shorter.  This is because of additional JavaScript optimizations that inevitably add to the total time.  Your resulting JavaScript should be smaller and faster, though, which should be the higher priority goal, after all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sanjiv Jivan</title>
		<link>http://blog.jdevelop.eu/2009/12/10/experiences-with-the-migration-from-gwt-171-to-20/comment-page-1/#comment-212</link>
		<dc:creator>Sanjiv Jivan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 15:58:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.jdevelop.eu/?p=493#comment-212</guid>
		<description>Hi Siegfried,
Small correction : SmartGWT has been using the new GWT addHandler style of event registration since the very initial release. SmartGWT is also fully compatible with GWT 2.0.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Siegfried,<br />
Small correction : SmartGWT has been using the new GWT addHandler style of event registration since the very initial release. SmartGWT is also fully compatible with GWT 2.0.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
